More information on this article can be found here

The more Internet scientists find out about us, the better they can build a business. That used to end with personalization, but now it’s about who we touch, and whether we matter more than Kim Kardashian.

“What’s important to advertisers is who influences who,” says Prabakhar Raghavan, head of Yahoo Labs. Figuring that out, he says, can raise the value of an Internet ad tenfold, or provide advertisers with influence. “Content is increasingly not the only form of engagement –is playing a game, or hanging out with your friends, content? We have to look at a spectrum of engagement.”

Hot off the servers: It’s not worth the $10,000 some advertisers pay for Kim Kardasian to Tweet about their product, Yahoo researchers found. At least not compared with paying 10,000 ordinary people $1 each to give the same plug. It is not that the nobodies have more followers,in aggregate; it’s that they are taken more sincerely, and so others are likely to propagate the plug. As sincerity is the kind of filter the rest of us look for in sorting out what’s real. Read more in this article in Forbes.com

Just found this really interesting article about brands, their websites and using other social platforms. Worth a read...

http://adage.com/cmostrategy/article?article_id=145351 

We're supporting Blue Dragon's most recent in store promotion, by promoting the new look Ingredients range through their website. Customers input unique reference numbers for the chance to win a Pan Asian cookery masterclass at London's Gilgamesh restaurant, hosted by Ian Pengelley. 25 runners up will win Ingredients gift packs.